The Bolshoi Theatre, one of the most prestigious and renowned ballet companies in the world, has recently performed in China, marking its first international tour since the COVID-19 pandemic. The state-owned theatre, which has been subject to Western sanctions due to Russia’s war in Ukraine, has expressed its hope to return to touring in the West someday. But is this hope realistic or naive? And what does the Bolshoi’s presence in China mean for the cultural and political relations between the two countries?

The Bolshoi Theatre, which means “big” or “grand” in Russian, was founded in 1776 by Empress Catherine the Great. It has a rich and turbulent history, reflecting the changes and challenges of Russian society and politics. The theatre has produced some of the most famous and influential ballets in history, such as Swan Lake, The Nutcracker, and The Sleeping Beauty. It has also been a showcase of Russian talent and culture, attracting millions of visitors from around the world.

However, the Bolshoi’s reputation and influence have been tarnished by the Ukraine crisis, which erupted in 2022 when Russia invaded and annexed Crimea and supported separatist rebels in eastern Ukraine. The war, which has killed more than 14,000 people and displaced millions more, has sparked international condemnation and sanctions against Russia. The sanctions have targeted not only economic and political sectors, but also cultural ones. The Bolshoi Theatre, as a state-owned institution, has been banned from performing in many Western countries, including the UK, France, Germany, and the US. Several leading dancers have also left the company in protest of Russia’s aggression.

The artistic director of the Bolshoi Ballet, Makhar Vaziev, has insisted that the troupe is “not suffering” from being unable to perform in the West. He has also expressed his confidence that “one day everything will go back to how it should be” because “culture is a wave that is very hard to suppress”. He has said that he is still in contact with his Western counterparts and hopes to resume cooperation and dialogue in the future.

But is this optimism justified or misplaced? Some observers have argued that the Bolshoi Theatre is unlikely to regain its former glory and status in the West anytime soon. They have pointed out that the cultural boycott is not only a response to Russia’s violation of international law and human rights, but also a reflection of the deepening mistrust and hostility between Russia and the West. They have also suggested that the Bolshoi Theatre is being used as a political pawn by the Kremlin to project its power and influence abroad.

This brings us to the question of why the Bolshoi Theatre has chosen to perform in China, which is one of Russia’s closest allies and partners. According to Vaziev, China is “one of a few countries that support and continue to cooperate with us”. He has praised China’s development and appreciation of ballet, as well as its efforts to contain the pandemic and ensure safety for the performers and audiences.

The Bolshoi Theatre’s visit to China can be seen as a sign of the growing cultural and political ties between the two countries, which share common interests and challenges in the face of Western pressure and competition. China has been a major supporter of Russia’s stance on Ukraine, as well as other issues such as Syria, Iran, and North Korea. The two countries have also increased their economic and military cooperation, especially in energy, trade, and defense sectors. The Bolshoi Theatre’s performance can be interpreted as a gesture of gratitude and friendship from Russia to China, as well as a demonstration of their shared values and vision.

However, some critics have questioned whether the Bolshoi Theatre’s presence in China is truly beneficial for both sides. They have argued that China’s support for Russia comes with strings attached, such as demanding more access to Russia’s natural resources and markets. They have also warned that China’s growing influence and ambition may pose a threat to Russia’s interests and security in the long run. Moreover, they have suggested that the Bolshoi Theatre’s performance may not be well received by some Chinese audiences, who may view it as a propaganda tool or a symbol of oppression.

In conclusion, the Bolshoi Theatre’s performance in China is a complex and controversial event that raises many questions about the role and impact of culture in international relations. On one hand, it can be seen as a way of building bridges and promoting dialogue between different nations and peoples. On the other hand, it can also be seen as a way of advancing political agendas and creating divisions among different nations and peoples. What do you think? Do you support or oppose the Bolshoi Theatre’s performance in China? Why or why not? Share your thoughts in the comments below.